Here's what I don't get.
They do what they can to trick you into reading the message with subject lines about your bank account and hi from an old friend.
The contents are full of intentional misspellings in an attempt to foil spam-catchers.
So do they think that if the message does escape both my mechanical and organic spam-filters, that if I open it and read it, I'm suddenly going to decide "Why yes, come to think of it, I *do* want to e''nlarge my p''enis! What the heck!" Or is it more, "Wow, they went to all that effort just to reach me... I really owe them something. Sure, here's my bank account number."
They do what they can to trick you into reading the message with subject lines about your bank account and hi from an old friend.
The contents are full of intentional misspellings in an attempt to foil spam-catchers.
So do they think that if the message does escape both my mechanical and organic spam-filters, that if I open it and read it, I'm suddenly going to decide "Why yes, come to think of it, I *do* want to e''nlarge my p''enis! What the heck!" Or is it more, "Wow, they went to all that effort just to reach me... I really owe them something. Sure, here's my bank account number."
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 02:01 pm (UTC)although if it's nearly free to send, it really doesn't take much response to make it profitable, tho.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 02:49 pm (UTC)Although I have also heard that porn-site spam has a significantly higher response rate.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:18 pm (UTC)Really, I am flattered though...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 07:30 pm (UTC)