gilana: (Default)
gilana ([personal profile] gilana) wrote2011-01-29 11:31 pm

On specificity

I went to see Savion Glover tonight. He's an amazing tap dancer -- watching his feet move so fast that a cloud of dust rose from the stage, I could easily believe that it was actually smoke, and that he would end up engulfed in a pillar of flame created by a pair of magic shoes.

But what struck me most about his performance in the end was the specificity, which is something I've been thinking about a lot for a while now. Savion knows exactly what sound every fraction of every inch on his shoe will make, how those sounds will differ on every section of the stage, and how to use those sounds softly or loudly and fast or slow to create amazing patterns and soundscapes that somehow end up expressing something. It's not just a matter of a shuffle or a toe dig; he has an entirely vocabulary that is miles beyond what most dancers can do, and he uses it intentionally.

It's the same in design. Some people might choose to use a sans serif font, and just go with Arial or Helvetica, where I might choose Univers 47 Condensed Light at 10/12 leading tracked out to 10.

It's there in writing; a rose might be red, or it could be a deep velvety crimson. A person can say something, or they can cry it, whisper it haltingly, mutter it… I'm not a writer, but you get what I mean.

I've been struggling over the past few years to really grok specificity in acting. I think I've made some progress on gesture -- I'm trying to move away from just waving my hands about, as we often do in normal conversation, and more toward specific choices, for example, a reaching motion that comes from the shoulder and uses the space around me, and that gets held until a specific beat in the scene. The harder part for me to pin down is in intention -- making emotions specific, figuring out precise relationships, knowing what I want from the other characters… there's a lot to work on there.

The more I think about it, the more I realize that there is specificity to be found in everything -- in painting, in cooking, in clothing, in speech. So! Where do you find it in your life? I challenge you to think about some of your choices over the next day or two and share with me some stories of where specificity matters to you, and if you feel making more specific choices makes a difference.

[identity profile] elizabear.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
Did you see this interview with him from the Globe today? Interesting stuff about his artistic theories.

http://www.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/articles/2011/01/29/for_savion_glover_teaching_is_as_gratifying_as_dancing/

[identity profile] lillibet.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
This would be a fascinating--and long--conversation to have with you sometime (or several--the one about specificity in acting is probably deserving of its own) but too long a general comment, so I'll stick to one thing: love. From the early days of my relationship with Jason, I have challenged him to think about and express why he loves me in the moment. Why he loves me in general is a mystery, but usually when he says it he's thinking of something specific: my smile, my cooking, my wit, my planning, my eyes, my appreciation of him, my skin, my parenting. I think that it's one of the things that keeps our relationship really strong--loving isn't simply a habit, it's an active, immediate, specific act.
dpolicar: (Default)

[personal profile] dpolicar 2011-01-30 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
I most often notice this when choosing the right word.

I attend to that more than many.

[identity profile] rebmommy.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
beautiful, thoughtful comment about love - thanks for sharing this

[identity profile] rebmommy.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
specificity is a must in my hospital chaplaincy, as I feel out what is the best way to be with each patient, the most useful way to say something to deepen a visit

[identity profile] firstfrost.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yesterday I finished the last of set 1 of pieces of the afghan I'm making, and have started fussing with how to sew it together. There are various choices for joining - whip stitch, chain crochet, whether you join through both loops or just one - and they have different properties (do they leave a border? lie flat, or create a ridge?). I finally picked whip stitch, for the lying flat. After that, I've been testing how to do all the required border embellishments - chain stitch? Picked up crochet that gets tacked down after? More free-form embroidery? I'm wavering towards chain stitch, though I'm not yet happy with it. Finally, there's weaving in the ends - I'm contemplating needle felting for that, which would be a new choice for me, but the yarn is particularly good for felting, so I'm optimistic.

[identity profile] buxom-bey.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I like this topic and plan to give it more thought. Thank you for sparking my brain.

Also, after [livejournal.com profile] lillibet's comment, I'm wondering about the possibility of putting together a discussion group.

[identity profile] zendzian.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Great post.

Much like you, I've been on a search for greater specificity in my acting. This search was sparked by the Shakespeare class I just took. My scene partner for Midsummer and I were meeting with the professor, and at one point, he noticed that my eyes weren't really focusing on one particular thing, and that oftentimes I would be breaking away from whatever I was looking that to look at my scene partner, what he called "checking in" with your scene partner. He wanted to start pushing me away from that choice, stating very simply that it wasn't specific enough, that I was wandering too much. He said that, as an audience member, if you see an actor wandering like that, the audience won't be as engaged. I had absolutely no idea I was even doing that. What I ended up realizing is that the lack of focus was coming from trying to remember my lines! The professor said to me at one point in this meeting: "Everything you do on stage has to be really, really specific."

From that moment, I've been working towards striking more of a balance between knowing my lines and making sure I'm directing my focus at a very specific point. I began right away to notice the difference it was making in the work I was doing both in class for the Hamlet scene we worked on after Midsummer, and in the work I was doing for Sweetest Swing. During both rehearsals and performances, after my scene was over, I would get off stage and immediately begin analyzing what I had just done: Was I engaging the other actors enough? Did I wander at all? Was I simply expressing an emotion, or did I find enough levels within that emotion to express it with more variety? The answers to these questions would be different from one night to the next, but by asking them I noticed that the time I spent on stage would be much more productive and it had improved the overall quality of my work. I received a greater deal of positive feedback, surprisingly more often from complete strangers in the audience!

I certainly don't mean to imply that I've perfected this. I think that only comes from years and years of practice, as well as having some guidance from someone who has had years and years of practice. So, it looks like you and I are in for the long haul. :)

[identity profile] firstfrost.livejournal.com 2011-01-30 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)
(Having started needle felting in the ends, I note that I have three different needles - the all-purpose needle, the heavy duty needle, and the delicate needle. I nearly always use the all-purpose needle, because needle felting isn't something I have a lot of skill/experience with, and I *don't* have that specificity yet.)
kelkyag: notched triangle signature mark in light blue on yellow (Default)

[personal profile] kelkyag 2011-01-31 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Pottery-wise, I am getting to the point where I realize that these decisions exist and that I need to look for/consider them, but I'm still oblivious to some (or haven't fought past my defaults) and vague on what the options are or how to weigh them against each other for others. Still, I'm starting to see that there's more to a line than where it goes and how wide it is -- how deep is it, what shape is the cut, how does it begin or end or merge, how does it interact with the lip and the foot and the glaze ...